Breakup and Atomization Characteristics of Liquid Jets in Strong Swirling Crossflow Based on the VOF-LPT Method

XIE Mingyun; PU Tianhao; LIU Hong; WU Shengqi

doi:10.21656/1000-0887.440110

Volume 44 Issue 9

Sep. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Applied Mathematics and Mechanics > 2023 > 44(9): 1054-1069

XIE Mingyun, PU Tianhao, LIU Hong, WU Shengqi. Breakup and Atomization Characteristics of Liquid Jets in Strong Swirling Crossflow Based on the VOF-LPT Method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 1054-1069. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.440110

Citation:

PDF( 7579 KB)

Breakup and Atomization Characteristics of Liquid Jets in Strong Swirling Crossflow Based on the VOF-LPT Method

doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.440110

XIE Mingyun^1
,,
PU Tianhao¹,
LIU Hong¹,
WU Shengqi^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P.R.China
2.
Sichuan Research Institue, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Chengdu 610500, P.R.China

Received Date: 2023-04-14
Rev Recd Date: 2023-08-17
Publish Date: 2023-09-01

Abstract

Abstract

The liquid jet breakup and atomization interacting with a strong swirling crossflow is of significance in designing advanced aeroengines. The Eulerian-Lagrangian method was utilized to simulate the jet breakup and atomization processes. The volume of fluid (VOF) method was employed to track the gas-liquid interface topology evolution during the jet breakup, while the Lagrangian particle tracing (LPT) method was used to track the discrete droplets and obtain the information on far-field liquid dispersion. The crossflow was designed with different swirl numbers, ranging from 0 to 2.5. Momentum ratio q between the liquid jet and the air flow was set to 10, and the gas Weber number was 39. Under these conditions, both the column and shear breakups were observed. The results indicate that, the development of axial waves induced by the Kevin-Helmholtz (KH) instability was the main cause for column breakup. During the surface breakup, ligaments and small liquid jet branches were stripped from the liquid jet surface, primarily driven by azimuthal shear waves. The strong swirling airflow enhances the jet column breakup process, leading to a lower radial height for the breakup location and a shorter breakup time. However, as the swirl number increases, the radial height of the onset of breakup would increase, which suggests the swirl flow would delay the surface breakup of liquid jets. With the increase of the swirl number, the velocity component in the flow direction decreases, and the jet trajectory in the radial direction increases significantly. The deflection angle of the jet shows a linear relationship with the position of the flow direction, with larger air swirl numbers resulting in a steeper slope. Furthermore, as the swirl number increases, the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of the entire spray field would decrease, and the liquid dispersion would increase.
- swirling crossflow,
- liquid jet,
- VOF,
- LPT,
- breakup and atomization characteristic

FullText(HTML)

致谢: 本文的计算是在上海交通大学高性能计算中心支持的Π2.0集群上进行的，在此表示衷心感谢.

References(28)

References

[1]	URZAY J. Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 50: 593-627. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045217
[2]	林宇震, 李林, 张弛, 等. 液体射流喷入横向气流混合特性研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(1): 46-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201401004.htm LIN Yuzhen, LI Lin, ZHANG Chi, et al. Progress on the mixing of liquid jet injected into a crossflow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(1): 46-57. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201401004.htm
[3]	JENNY P, ROEKAERTS D, BEISHUIZEN N. Modeling of turbulent dilute spray combustion[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38(6): 846-887. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.07.001
[4]	XIAO F, DIANAT M, MCGUIRK J J. Large eddy simulation of liquid-jet primary breakup in air crossflow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51(12): 2878-2893. doi: 10.2514/1.J052509
[5]	HERRMANN M, ARIENTI M, SOTERIOU M. The impact of density ratio on the liquid core dynamics of a turbulent liquid jet injected into a crossflow[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2011, 133(6): 061501-061510. doi: 10.1115/1.4002273
[6]	袁朝华. 非均匀横向气流场中的射流雾化现象研究[D]. 硕士学位论文. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2018. YUAN Chaohua. Study on jet breakup in non-uniform air crossflow field[D]. Master Thesis. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2018. (in Chinese)
[7]	WU P K, KIRKENDALL K A, FULLER R P, et al. Breakup processes of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1997, 13(1): 64-73. doi: 10.2514/2.5151
[8]	FAETH G M. Liquid atomization in multiphase flows: a review[C]// 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference. Norfolk, VA, 1999.
[9]	刘静, 徐旭. 高速气流中横向液体射流雾化研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2009, 39(3) : 273-283. LIU Jing, XU Xu. The research development of liquid jet atomization in high speed crossflow[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2009, 39(3): 273-283. (in Chinese)
[10]	SALLAM K A, AALBURG C, FAETH G M. Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow[J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(12): 2529-2540. doi: 10.2514/1.3749
[11]	BEHZAD M, ASHGRIZ N, MASHAYEK A. Azimuthal shear instability of a liquid jet injected into a gaseous cross-flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 767: 146-172. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.36
[12]	BROUMAND M, BIROUK M. Liquid jet in a subsonic gaseous crossflow: recent progress and remaining challenges[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2016, 57: 1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.08.003
[13]	BECKER J, HASSA C. Liquid fuel placement and mixing of generic aeroengine premix module at different operating conditions[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2003, 125(4): 901-908. doi: 10.1115/1.1587741
[14]	FREITAG S. Experimental investigations of fuel preparation in a swirling airflow under realistic conditions without reaction in a combustor model with a point fuel source[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2018, 9(3): 475-490. doi: 10.1007/s13272-018-0295-2
[15]	SIKRORIA T, KUSHARI A, SYED S, et al. Experimental investigation of liquid jet breakup in a cross flow of a swirling air stream[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2014, 136(6): 061501. doi: 10.1115/1.4026244
[16]	TAMBE S B, JENG S M. A study of liquid jets injected transversely into a swirling cross flow[C]//Proceedings of ILASS Americas, 21st Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Orlando, FL, 2008.
[17]	MASUDA B J, MCDONELL V G, OSKAM G W. Mixing of a plain jet into a swirling crossflow[C]//Proceedings of ILASS Americas, 21st Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Orlando, FL, 2008.
[18]	PATIL S, SAHU S. Air swirl effect on spray characteristics and droplet dispersion in a twin-jet crossflow airblast injector[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(7): 073314. doi: 10.1063/5.0054430
[19]	PRAKASH S R, JAIN S S, LOVETT J A, et al. Detailed numerical simulations of atomization of a liquid jet in a swirling gas crossflow[J]. Atomization and Sprays, 2019, 29(5): 1-17.
[20]	JIN T, WANG G, ZOU J, et al. Multiscale simulation of liquid jet breakup in swirling crossflows: breakup mechanism and spray structures[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4092611.
[21]	XIAO H, GOLLNER M J, ORAN E S. From fire whirls to blue whirls and combustion with reduced pollution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016, 113(34): 9457-9462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605860113
[22]	HEINRICH M, SCHWARZE R. 3D-coupling of volume-of-fluid and Lagrangian particle tracking for spray atomization simulation in OpenFOAM[J]. SoftwareX, 2020, 11: 100483. doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2020.100483
[23]	TANGIRALA V, CHEN R H, DRISCOLL J F. Effect of heat release and swirl on the recirculation within swirl-stabilized flames[J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 1987, 51(1/3): 75-95.
[24]	BEHZAD M, ASHGRIZ N, KARNEY B W. Surface breakup of a non-turbulent liquid jet injected into a high pressure gaseous crossflow[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 80: 100-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.11.007
[25]	SHINJO J, UMEMURA A. Simulation of liquid jet primary breakup: dynamics of ligament and droplet formation[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2010, 36(7): 513-532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.03.008
[26]	XIE M, WU S, YU B, et al. Numerical investigation of the bifurcating behavior of liquid jets in crossflow[C]//Proceedings of ILASS Asia 22nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. 2022.
[27]	GOPALA Y, ZHANG P, BIBIK O, et al. Liquid fuel jet in crossflow-trajectory correlations based on the column breakup point[C]// 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, Florida, 2010.
[28]	MARMOTTANT P, VILLERMAUX E. On spray formation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 498: 73-111. doi: 10.1017/S0022112003006529