• Scopus收录
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中文核心期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于AGA-PINNs方法求解具有间断解的方程

刘博宇 江林峰 杨凤莲

刘博宇, 江林峰, 杨凤莲. 基于AGA-PINNs方法求解具有间断解的方程[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2026, 47(7): 895-911. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460129
引用本文: 刘博宇, 江林峰, 杨凤莲. 基于AGA-PINNs方法求解具有间断解的方程[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2026, 47(7): 895-911. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460129
Liu Boyu, Jiang Linfeng, Yang Fenglian. Solving Equations With Discontinuous Solutions Based on the AGA-PINNs Method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(7): 895-911. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460129
Citation: Liu Boyu, Jiang Linfeng, Yang Fenglian. Solving Equations With Discontinuous Solutions Based on the AGA-PINNs Method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2026, 47(7): 895-911. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460129

基于AGA-PINNs方法求解具有间断解的方程

doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.460129
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 12271140

中央高校基本科研业务费 B220202081

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘博宇(2001—),男,硕士生(E-mail: 231362010004@hhu.edu.cn)

    江林峰(2000—),男,博士生(E-mail: mathlfjiang@hhu.edu.cn)

    通讯作者:

    杨凤莲(1982—),女,副教授,博士(通信作者. E-mail: yangfenglian@hhu.edu.cn)

  • 中图分类号: O241

Solving Equations With Discontinuous Solutions Based on the AGA-PINNs Method

  • 摘要: 物理信息神经网络(physics-informed neural networks, PINNs)是求解偏微分方程的重要工具,在偏微分方程的数值求解中,具有间断解的方程是目前的研究难题,PINNs及其现有的改进算法通常无法捕捉到间断的特性,然而在流体力学领域需要考虑许多间断问题. 针对PINNs处理具有间断解的方程的不足,本文提出了自适应梯度消灭的物理信息神经网络(adaptive gradient-annihilated PINNs, AGA-PINNs)方法来求解具有间断解的Burgers方程与Allen-Cahn方程. 该方法利用与梯度相关的权重函数来优化损失函数,并在训练过程中根据当前的残差分布动态调整训练点,以逐步强化模型对间断区域的学习能力. 算例结果表明,AGA-PINNs方法比传统的PINNs方法、gPINNs方法、GA-PINNs方法、高阶DG方法等对于物理量的预测精度有显著提升,在求解Burgers方程与Allen-Cahn方程时均方误差降低了大约一个数量级,准确地再现了Burgers方程中冲击波的特征与Allen-Cahn方程中相分离现象.
  • 图  1  AGA-PINNs框架图

    Figure  1.  The AGA-PINNs framework diagram

    图  2  不同采样方法生成256个训练点的可视化结果

    Figure  2.  Visualization results of 256 training points generated with different sampling methods

    图  3  不同βu值时AGA-PINNs预测物理量的均方误差

    Figure  3.  δMSE of predicting physical quantities using AGA-PINNs with different βu values

    图  4  Burgers方程精确解

        为了解释图中的颜色,读者可以参考本文的电子网页版本,后同.

    Figure  4.  The exact solution of the Burgers equation

    图  5  求解Burgers方程初始训练后PDE残差

        为了解释图中的颜色,读者可以参考本文的电子网页版本,后同.

    Figure  5.  PDE residuals after initial training in solving the Burgers equation

    图  6  不同m值AGA-PINNs求解Burgers方程均方误差

    Figure  6.  δMSE in solving the Burgers equation using AGA PINNs with different m values

    图  7  m=30时AGA-PINNs求解Burgers方程预测结果

    Figure  7.  Predicting results of AGA-PINNs with m=30 for solving Burgers equation

    图  8  不同采样方法AGA-PINNs求解Burgers方程预测结果

    Figure  8.  Predicted results of the Burgers equation using the AGA-PINNs with different sampling methods

    图  9  Allen-Cahn方程精确解

    Figure  9.  The exact solution of the Allen-Cahn equation

    图  10  求解Allen-Cahn方程初始训练后PDE残差

    Figure  10.  PDE residuals after initial training in solving the Allen-Cahn equation

    图  11  不同m值AGA-PINNs求解Allen-Cahn方程均方误差

    Figure  11.  δMSE in solving the Allen-Cahn equation using the AGA-PINNs with different m values

    图  12  m=30时AGA-PINNs求解Allen-Cahn方程预测结果

    Figure  12.  Predicted results with the AGA-PINNs for m=30 in solving the Allen-Cahn equation

    图  13  不同方法求解Burgers方程的Riemann问题的预测结果

    Figure  13.  Prediction results of the Burgers equation for the Riemann problem solved with different methods

    图  14  m=30时AGA-PINNs求解Bugers方程的Riemann问题的预测结果

    Figure  14.  Predicting results of AGA-PINNs for m=30 in solving the Burgers equation of the Riemann problem

    表  1  不同方法求解Burgers方程损失及δMSE

    Table  1.   Losses and δMSE in solving the Burgers equation with different methods

    method loss δMSE
    GA-PINNs 1.06×10-6 6.23×10-5
    PINNs 1.49×10-5 8.10×10-4
    gPINNs 7.48×10-5 6.01×10-3
    GAN 4.82×10-6 9.17×10-5
    PINNsFormer 9.58×10-6 2.62×10-4
    high-order DG - 7.99×10-5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同m值AGA-PINNs求解Burgers方程损失及δMSE

    Table  2.   Losses and δMSE in solving the Burgers equation with the AGA-PINNs for different m values

    number of adaptive points loss δMSE
    10 1.08×10-6 7.13×10-5
    20 6.06×10-7 3.19×10-6
    30 3.71×10-7 1.31×10-6
    40 8.98×10-7 8.02×10-6
    50 1.03×10-6 5.55×10-5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同方法求解Allen-Cahn方程损失及δMSE

    Table  3.   Losses and δMSE in solving the Allen-Cahn equation with different methods

    method loss δMSE
    GA-PINNs 9.18×10-6 7.88×10-4
    PINNs 8.23×10-5 2.37×10-3
    gPINNs 1.75×10-5 8.05×10-4
    GAN 1.92×10-5 9.39×10-4
    PINNsFormer 6.46×10-5 1.69×10-3
    high-order DG - 3.22×10-4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同m值AGA-PINNs求解Allen-Cahn方程损失及δMSE

    Table  4.   Losses and δMSE in solving the Allen-Cahn equation with the AGA-PINNs for different m values

    number of adaptive points loss δMSE
    10 1.88×10-6 3.19×10-4
    20 8.96×10-7 2.57×10-4
    30 2.02×10-7 3.52×10-5
    40 6.47×10-7 1.01×10-4
    50 9.25×10-7 2.41×10-4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同m值AGA-PINNs求解Burgers方程的Riemann问题的损失及δMSE

    Table  5.   Losses and δMSE in solving the Burgers equation of the Riemann problem with the AGA-PINNs for different m values

    number of adaptive points loss δMSE
    10 7.49×10-6 8.12×10-4
    20 1.18×10-6 6.44×10-4
    30 4.26×10-7 7.19×10-5
    40 6.58×10-7 9.83×10-5
    50 9.32×10-7 3.57×10-4
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Zhang K, Zhao X G, Zhang L M, et al. Current status and prospect for the research and application of big data and intelligent optimization methods in oilfield development[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2020, 44(4): 28-38.
    [2] Wang Y, Cheung S W, Chung E T, et al. Deep multiscale model learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 406: 109071. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109071
    [3] 邱天威, 魏光美, 宋禹欣, 等. 基于PINN方法的KdV类方程新孤子解的研究[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2025, 46(1): 105-113. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.450122

    Qiu Tianwei, Wei Guangmei, Song Yuxin, et al. Novel soliton solutions to KdV-type equations based on physics-informed neural networks[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 105-113. (in Chinese) doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.450122
    [4] Zha W, Li X, Li D, et al. Shale digital core image generation based on generative adversarial networks[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2021, 143(3): 033003. doi: 10.1115/1.4048052
    [5] 肖争光, 张春利, 陈伟球. 基于PINNs的压电半导体梁的非线性多场耦合力学分析[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2024, 45(10): 1288-1299. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.450070

    Xiao Zhengguang, Zhang Chunli, Chen Weiqiu. Analysis of nonlinear multi-field coupling mechanics of piezoelectric semiconductor beams via PINNs[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 1288-1299. (in Chinese) doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.450070
    [6] Pang G, Lu L, Karniadakis G E. fPINNs: fractional physics-informed neural networks[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2019, 41(4): A2603-A2626. doi: 10.1137/18M1229845
    [7] 闵建, 傅卓佳, 郭远. 课程-迁移学习物理信息神经网络用于曲面长时间对流扩散行为模拟[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2024, 45(9): 1212-1223. doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.440320

    Min Jian, Fu Zhuojia, Guo Yuan. Curriculum-transfer-learning-based physics-informed neural networks for simulating long-term-evolution convection-diffusion behaviors on curved surfaces[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 1212-1223. (in Chinese) doi: 10.21656/1000-0887.440320
    [8] Li X, Chen H, Liu Z, et al. Identifying varying thermal diffusivity of inhomogeneous materials based on a hybrid physics-informed neural network[J]. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2022, 14(7): 2250027. doi: 10.1142/S1758825122500272
    [9] Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks[J]. Neural Networks, 1990, 3(5): 551-560. doi: 10.1016/0893-6080(90)90005-6
    [10] Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
    [11] Lu L, Meng X, Mao Z, et al. DeepXDE: a deep learning library for solving differential equations[J]. SIAM Review, 2021, 63(1): 208-228. doi: 10.1137/19M1274067
    [12] Yu J, Lu L, Meng X, et al. Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 393: 114823. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.114823
    [13] Guo H, Zhuang X, Fu X, et al. Physics-informed deep learning for three-dimensional transient heat transfer analysis of functionally graded materials[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2023, 72(3): 513-524. doi: 10.1007/s00466-023-02287-x
    [14] Raissi M, Yazdani A, Karniadakis G E. Hidden fluid mechanics: learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations[J]. Science, 2020, 367(6481): 1026-1030. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4741
    [15] Bar-Kohany T, Jain A. Dissipation of boundary effects in multilayer heat conduction problems[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2024, 223: 125207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125207
    [16] Ferrer-Sánchez A, Martín-Guerrero J D, de Austri-Bazan R R, et al. Gradient-annihilated PINNs for solving Riemann problems: application to relativistic hydrodynamics[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 424: 116906. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2024.116906
    [17] Mao Z, Jagtap A D, Karniadakis G E. Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 360: 112789. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789
    [18] Xu H, Chang H, Zhang D. DL-PDE: deep-learning based data-driven discovery of partial differential equations from discrete and noisy data[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2025, 29(3): 698-728.
    [19] Xu J, Wei H, Bao H. Physics-informed neural networks for studying heat transfer in porous media[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 217: 124671. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124671
    [20] Lu L, Pestourie R, Yao W, et al. Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse design[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2021, 43(6): B1105-B1132.
    [21] Mahmud M S, Huang J Z, Salloum S, et al. A survey of data partitioning and sampling methods to support big data analysis[J]. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2020, 3(2): 85-101. doi: 10.26599/BDMA.2019.9020015
    [22] Nabian M A, Gladstone R J, Meidani H. Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance sampling[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2021, 36(8): 962-977. doi: 10.1111/mice.12685
    [23] Renardy M, Joslyn L R, Millar J A, et al. To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications[J]. Mathematical Biosciences, 2021, 337: 108593. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108593
    [24] Wu C, Zhu M, Tan Q, et al. A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networks[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 403: 115671. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115671
    [25] Mishra S, Molinaro R. Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks for approximating PDEs[J]. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 2023, 43(1): 1-43. doi: 10.1093/imanum/drab093
    [26] de Lara F M, Ferrer E. Accelerating high order discontinuous Galerkin solvers using neural networks: 1D Burgers' equation[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2022, 235: 105274.
    [27] Du Q, Yang J, Zhou Z. Time-fractional Allen-Cahn equations: analysis and numerical methods[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2020, 85(2): 42. doi: 10.1007/s10915-020-01351-5
    [28] Toro E F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: a Practical Introduction[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
    [29] Zeng S, Zhang Z, Zou Q. Adaptive deep neural networks methods for high-dimensional partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 463: 111232. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111232
    [30] Zhang H, Xu Y, Liu Q, et al. Solving Fokker-Planck equations using deep KD-tree with a small amount of data[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022, 108(4): 4029-4043. doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07361-2
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  41
  • HTML全文浏览量:  12
  • PDF下载量:  13
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-06-25
  • 修回日期:  2025-07-30
  • 刊出日期:  2026-07-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回